classical arguments

Chapter 14's discussion of classical arguments tells us that arguments need to be thoroughly researched and backed up with specific evidence.  It tells us to research all possible sides of the argument with an open mind in order to make the most informed decision.  Once you have found the side of an argument that you agree with, it is necessary to persuade your audience to believe and agree with the claim you are making.  To do this your argument needs to be backed up with specific evidence.  This really relates to the strong response essay that we are working on right now because it is necessary for us to use as many specific details and examples as possible.  If we don't use enough examples, our readers will not be persuaded and will not be moved to your side of the argument.  Even though it feels like I am using way too many examples and explaining my position in too much depth, it is really necessary to get the point across.  If there are not sufficient claims to back up an argument, why should anyone believe what you are claiming?